Subclass 407 Nomination Refused: What Happens to the Training Visa Application?

A subclass 407 nomination refusal can fundamentally affect the related Training visa application. The Training visa process involves separate sponsorship, nomination and visa requirements. A visa applicant should therefore understand which application has been refused, who has review rights, and whether another nomination or visa strategy is available.

This article explains the practical issues to check after a 407 nomination refusal. It does not assume that every refusal can be reviewed or that lodging a new application is appropriate.

The 407 process has separate stages

The subclass 407 Training visa is designed for occupational training activities. Home Affairs recognises different types of occupational training, and the nomination requirements depend on the purpose and structure of the proposed training.

A typical case may involve:

• an approved temporary activities sponsor;
• a nomination identifying the proposed training and nominee; and
• the individual subclass 407 visa application.

These are connected, but they are not the same application. A refusal at the nomination stage should therefore be read separately from any later decision on the visa.

Why a refused nomination matters to the visa application

The visa application depends on the relevant sponsorship and nomination requirements being met. If the nomination is refused and there is no approved nomination capable of supporting the application, the Department may be unable to grant the associated visa.

That does not mean the Department will necessarily decide both matters on the same day. Sponsors and applicants should monitor each application independently and keep copies of all correspondence.

Read the nomination refusal reasons carefully

The refusal record should identify the requirement the decision-maker considered was not met. Common areas requiring close analysis can include:

• whether the proposed activity is genuine occupational training rather than ordinary productive work;
• whether the training is properly structured and supervised;
• whether the nominee requires the proposed training;
• whether the training type selected matches the actual purpose;
• the sponsor’s capacity to deliver the training;
• the relationship between the training activities and the nominee’s occupation or professional development; and
• evidence concerning the workplace, trainer, timetable and learning outcomes.

A refusal should not be answered merely by adding more documents. First identify the legal and factual finding that caused the refusal.

Does the sponsor have ART review rights?

Some migration decisions are reviewable by the Administrative Review Tribunal, but review rights depend on the type of decision, the legislation and the circumstances. The refusal notification should state whether the decision is reviewable, who may apply and the applicable deadline.

Do not assume that the visa applicant has the same review right as the sponsor. Equally, do not wait for the related visa refusal before checking a nomination review deadline.

Our guide to visa refusals and review options explains why the decision record and review deadline should be checked immediately.

What happens if the visa application is still pending?

If the visa remains undecided after the nomination refusal, obtain advice before withdrawing anything. Depending on the circumstances, questions may arise about whether a fresh nomination can be lodged, whether the visa application can rely on it, whether a new visa application is required, and what happens to the applicant’s current immigration status.

These questions are fact-sensitive. A new nomination does not automatically repair every pending visa application.

Should you lodge a new 407 nomination?

A fresh nomination may be appropriate in some cases, but only after the original refusal has been analysed. Repeating the same training plan with minor wording changes can reproduce the same problem.

Before relodgement, review:

• the refusal reasons line by line;
• the occupational training type selected;
• the nominee’s existing qualifications and experience;
• the identified skills gap;
• the training objectives and measurable outcomes;
• who provides supervision and how often;
• the proportion of training compared with productive duties;
• the workplace resources available; and
• whether the proposed duration is justified.

Our existing 407 document checklist can assist with organising the underlying material, but the refusal reasons should drive the response strategy.

What if the visa is later refused?

If the visa is refused, review rights must be assessed from the visa refusal notification separately. The identity of the review applicant, the applicant’s location, the sponsor’s status and other statutory factors can matter.

A review application also does not automatically solve a defective training plan. If the merits issue is the genuineness or structure of the training, the evidentiary case should address that issue directly.

Check bridging visa consequences

For an applicant in Australia, the effect of a refusal on lawful status and any bridging visa should be checked immediately. Do not rely on an assumed “28 days” or other generic period. Read the current bridging visa grant notice and obtain advice based on the actual decision and any review lodged.

Documents to take to a 407 refusal consultation

Provide the nomination refusal letter and decision record, sponsorship approval, nomination application, training plan, visa application, all Department requests, responses, organisational chart, trainer details and the nominee’s CV and qualifications.

The objective is to reconstruct exactly what the Department had before it and determine whether review, relodgement or a different visa pathway should be considered.

If your 407 nomination has been refused, contact Emigrate Lawyers promptly so that any review deadline and related visa consequences can be assessed.

Related guides: See our 407 training plan refusal guide and our guide to 407 refusals without a section 57 letter.

Official resource: Home Affairs subclass 407 occupational training types.

This article is general information only and does not constitute legal advice.

About the author

Madhab Kharel

Principal Lawyer & Director, Emigrate Lawyers

Madhab Kharel is the Principal Lawyer and Director of Emigrate Lawyers, an Australian law firm assisting clients across Australia and internationally. His migration law practice includes Partner Visas, Protection Visas, visa refusals and cancellations, Administrative Review Tribunal matters, health and character issues, Schedule 3, Section 48, sponsorship limitations and employer-sponsored migration. He regularly advises clients with complex immigration histories and matters requiring detailed legal submissions and evidence strategy.

View Madhab Kharel's full profile