Giving Back              Success Stories              News & Update               Careers  

Registered Your Relationship After Lodging a Partner Visa: Does It Help the 12-Month Rule?
Emigrate Lawyers | Immigration & Family Lawyers Emigrate Lawyers | Immigration & Family Lawyers

Registered Your Relationship After Lodging a Partner Visa: Does It Help the 12-Month Rule?

Registering a de facto relationship after a Partner Visa has already been lodged can be legally relevant, but it is not a universal cure for an application that was defective at lodgement. The effect depends on exactly what requirement is in issue.

This is a narrower question than whether relationship registration can remove the ordinary 12-month de facto duration rule in general. For that broader topic, see our registered relationship and 12-month rule guide.

The 12-month de facto rule looks back to the application date

Regulation 2.03A generally requires the Minister to be satisfied that a de facto Partner Visa applicant had been in the de facto relationship for at least 12 months immediately before the application, unless an exception applies.

Registered relationships are an exception to that duration rule

Regulation 2.03A(5) provides that the 12-month duration requirement in subregulation (3) does not apply if the de facto relationship is a registered relationship within the recognised federal definition. That is why relationship registration can be important where a genuine de facto couple has been together for less than 12 months.

Can registration after lodgement help?

Potentially, yes, because the statutory exception concerns whether the de facto relationship is a recognised registered relationship. However, registration after lodgement should not be treated as automatically fixing every problem. The applicant still needs to have had a qualifying de facto relationship at the relevant time and satisfy the visa’s other criteria.

What registration cannot retrospectively create

A registration certificate does not turn an ordinary dating relationship into a past de facto relationship if the couple did not actually meet the de facto criteria when required. It also does not cure section 48, Schedule 3, No Further Stay, sponsor eligibility, character, health or other unrelated problems.

Why timing still matters

If the application is already close to decision, a registration process that has not yet been completed may not assist. The couple should also check whether the state or territory relationship-register scheme is one recognised for federal migration purposes and whether the certificate has actually issued.

Illustrative case example: eight-month de facto relationship at lodgement

Composite example: A genuine de facto couple lodged an onshore Partner Visa after eight months together and later registered their relationship under a recognised state scheme. The legal review did not assume that registration erased the original chronology. Instead, it checked whether the couple had genuinely been de facto at lodgement, whether the registration fell within regulation 2.03A(5), and whether any other lodgement or Schedule 3 issue remained. The certificate was then provided as a material update to the pending application.

What should be uploaded after registration?

  • The issued relationship-registration certificate.
  • An updated relationship statement if the registration forms part of the couple’s chronology.
  • Current evidence showing the de facto relationship remains genuine and continuing.
  • Any Home Affairs change-of-circumstances notification required by the facts.

The underlying duration rule appears in regulation 2.03A of the Migration Regulations 1994. For onshore applications, see our 820/801 Partner Visa hub.

General information only. Whether post-lodgement registration assists depends on the exact criteria, the relationship at lodgement, and the recognised registration scheme.


Related Insights:

Legal review

Reviewed by , Principal Lawyer

Date reviewed: 6 August 2026

Categories

Recent News

Tag Cloud